Home > Press Release > Examples of legislation/policy guiding public participation

Examples of legislation/policy guiding public participation

Hello, members:

We’re hoping you can help us respond to a national effort to compile best practices in public participation.  Anything you can contribute, please send to IAP2USA President-elect Larry Schooler at larry.schooler@austintexas.gov by July 9th.

A set of national associations, including the National League of Cities, American Bar Association, and Int’l City/County Management Association, is working to draft model policies, resolutions, and ordinances on public engagement and democratic governance. As part of this effort, we are soliciting examples of innovative legal documents or language being used to structure and guide public participation. 

This work responds to a significant challenge many cities face. Innovative practices for public engagement, including online tools and apps, have grown dramatically in recent years. Traditional legal frameworks for citizen participation were developed before these new avenues were available. To respond effectively to 21st Century citizens, and to address pressing fiscal, social, and political issues, cities need laws and policies that reflect what is working for cities today.

 

Effective public engagement includes various elements:

 

1)    Recruiting a diverse, inclusive group of community residents ;

2)    Involving community residents through both online and face-to-face venues;

3)    Providing participants opportunities to consider a range of views and policy options about a public issue; and

4)    Designing and implementing public engagement that produces tangible recommendations, actions and outcomes.

 

We need your help in finding sample policies, procedures, resolutions, or ordinances on public participation and engagement.  

 

  1. Can you share examples of local governments that have revised or adopted policies, procedures, resolutions or ordinances to enable greater or more innovative public engagement in local governance?
  2. Have you seen policies, procedures, resolutions, or ordinances that address alternative formats for public meetings?
  3. Can you share policies, procedures, resolutions, or ordinances that address that the use of social media or online technologies to generate and consider policy alternatives?
  4. Are you aware of policies, procedures, resolutions, or ordinances that address the definitions of “public” and “participation” or standards for quality public participation engagement?
  5. Are there state statutes or laws that represent a barrier or obstacle to innovation in public engagement? If so, what are they? Have you encountered an obstacle or barrier based on state law?
  6. Are there issues for public engagement arising out of state Freedom of Information, Public Meetings, or Sunshine Acts? If so, what are they?
  7. Please share any other information or examples you think are relevant to our effort.
Categories: Press Release
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s